What this is

Trading fee for ownership, structured so the equity is actually worth holding. Frequently a way of not paying you unless the terms are right.

What it looks like in practice

  • Valuation review against comparable deals
  • Vesting, protective rights and information rights
  • Performance obligation scoping
  • Liquidity and exit terms

What you get

Deliverables, stated up front.

Included in scope

  • Valuation assessment
  • Term recommendations
  • Obligation scope
  • Liquidity and exit terms

Where it sits

Part of Talent Ventures.

Building businesses that outlast the career that funded them.

See the whole practice

Frequently asked

Equity Partnerships, in plain terms.

Should I take equity instead of a fee?

Only where valuation is defensible, vesting is fair and liquidity is realistic. Otherwise take the fee.

What protective rights should I have?

Information rights at minimum, plus consent on material decisions and anti-dilution where possible.

What if the venture fails publicly?

It attaches to your name. That risk should be priced into the terms from the start.

In more depth

Sometimes ownership, sometimes not being paid.

See the whole practice

Valuation determines whether it is a deal

Equity at an inflated valuation in exchange for a real fee is a discount, not an investment.

Protective rights matter more than percentage

Information rights, anti-dilution and consent thresholds decide whether minority equity is worth anything.

Liquidity is the question nobody asks

Equity with no realistic route to liquidity is a number on paper. Ask before signing, not after.

Also in Talent Ventures

Related services.

Owned BrandsInvesting & AdvisoryFoundations & Causes

Start here

Talk to us about access and representation.

Send a brief → How we work