What this is

House of brands, branded house, or the expensive hybrid in between. A decision that shapes marketing cost for a decade, made with the acquisition roadmap and retail reality in the room.

What it looks like in practice

  • Portfolio mapping against customer overlap and channel
  • Endorsement strategy for sub-brands
  • Naming conventions and acquisition integration rules
  • Migration plan where a change is required

What you get

Deliverables, stated up front.

Included in scope

  • Architecture model and rationale
  • Naming convention
  • Sub-brand endorsement rules
  • Migration roadmap

Where it sits

Part of Brand Strategy & Positioning.

What you stand for, said in a way a customer can repeat.

See the whole practice

Frequently asked

Portfolio Architecture, in plain terms.

When should a sub-brand be absorbed?

When its customers overlap heavily with the parent and it carries no distinct equity worth maintaining.

Can we run both models?

Most groups do, in practice. The problem is doing it accidentally rather than by rule.

How long does migration take?

Twelve to twenty-four months for a meaningful brand, mostly for search and channel reasons rather than design.

In more depth

A decision that costs money for a decade.

See the whole practice

House of brands versus branded house

The choice determines your marketing cost base for years. Every acquisition, every line extension and every new market inherits it.

Acquisitions default to keeping their names

Which is how groups end up with fourteen brands and no shared equity. Deciding the integration rule before the next deal is far cheaper than after.

Migration has a customer cost

Renaming an established sub-brand loses search traffic and customer recognition. It is sometimes right and it is never free.

Also in Brand Strategy & Positioning

Related services.

Positioning & NarrativeIdentity SystemsResearch & Insight

Start here

Start with a conversation, not a proposal.

Send a brief → How we work