What this is

Communications that run alongside counsel rather than against it. A statement that wins the news cycle and damages the case is a failure.

What it looks like in practice

  • Joint working with legal counsel from the outset
  • Statements drafted within the legal position
  • Court reporting management
  • Long term record management post-resolution

What you get

Deliverables, stated up front.

Included in scope

  • Joint legal and communication protocol
  • Approved statement framework
  • Reporting management plan
  • Post-resolution record strategy

Where it sits

Part of Reputation & Crisis.

The work nobody wants to need, prepared before it is needed.

See the whole practice

Frequently asked

Litigation Communications, in plain terms.

Can I comment on ongoing proceedings?

Very limitedly, and only with counsel's agreement. This is where reputational damage is most often self-inflicted.

What if coverage is inaccurate?

Correction requests through proper channels, coordinated with legal. Public argument with reporters rarely helps.

After it resolves?

A deliberate programme to rebuild the search record. It does not happen on its own.

In more depth

Counsel and communications in the same room.

See the whole practice

A statement that wins the day and loses the case is a failure

Communications drafted without legal review can prejudice proceedings. The two functions work jointly or not at all.

Court reporting has its own rules

Contempt and sub judice constraints limit what may be said while proceedings are live, and breaching them compounds the problem.

The record outlasts the case

Coverage of proceedings persists long after resolution. Post-resolution record management is a distinct piece of work.

Also in Reputation & Crisis

Related services.

Crisis CounselDigital FootprintPersonality Rights

Start here

Talk to us about access and representation.

Send a brief → How we work